Republican hacks like to point out that Sarah Palin is the most popular Governor in the United States. They also like to call Obama a socialist for his tax policies.
Here's the thing: Sarah Palin fought for an increase in Alaska's tax on profits of oil companies that do business in Alaska, and she sent $1,200 checks with the resulting revenues to Alaskans to help pay their rising fuel bills.
So, in summary, the Governor of Alaska increased taxes on privately-generated wealth and sent the proceeds to the citizens of the state, to help pay bills that were higher because that taxed industry was doing so well.
That's socialism.
Now, it ought to be fairly obvious that if the citizens of a state get an additional check in the mail for $1,200 and the Governor takes credit for it, that Governor's popularity is going to rise. Handing out checks makes a person popular. I'm sure Ms. Palin is popular for other reasons, but I've got to believe those checks are a big part of it.
Try asking a right wing hack about that.
I have tried asking Owen Robinson three times what he'd think if Governor Doyle raised taxes on our primary industry and wrote us checks from the resulting revenues. He has not had the nerve to respond.
Tonight I tried asking Brian Fraley. His response was, well, Bill Ayers.
That's what hacks do. If facts are problematic and cannot be answered to easily, then those questions are either ignored or a diversion is attempted.
It works on the other side too.
So again I ask, how do people live with the hypocrisy and cowardice necessary for hard-core partisanship?
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Throw Bachmann Out
It sounds as if Michelle Bachmann is on the ropes, and I sincerely hope she gets knocked out of office on election day.
The things she said on Hardball were bad enough - accusing Sen. Obama of being anti-American, and then demanding the press investigate members of Congress for anti-American sentiment.
Yet another in a long line of the "if you don't agree with me, you hate America" type of idiot conservative who adopted the victimology of the "if you don't agree with me, you hate blacks/women/the poor" liberals.
But no, after saying those things on Hardball she has the audacity, nay cowardice, to claim that it was all Chris Matthews' fault. He laid a trap, led me into it, I am a victim.
Any serious person who watches that interview sees pretty clearly that if anything, Matthews opened the door by asking Ms. Bachmann to clarify her beliefs, and Ms. Bachmann barged right through. There was no trap, no confusing language in Matthews' question. He asked directly what she thought of Mr. Obama and she answered as she obviously believes.
Cowards and idiots like her do not deserve to be in elected office, whether it's the city council or the U.S. Congress. And to show I'm bipartisan in my disdain for morons, the same goes for the Democrat Congressman in Florida who only won office because of Foley's sexual problems but who went on to cheat on his wife several dozen times.
I seriously hope that party loyalty cannot overcome common sense in both cases.
The things she said on Hardball were bad enough - accusing Sen. Obama of being anti-American, and then demanding the press investigate members of Congress for anti-American sentiment.
Yet another in a long line of the "if you don't agree with me, you hate America" type of idiot conservative who adopted the victimology of the "if you don't agree with me, you hate blacks/women/the poor" liberals.
But no, after saying those things on Hardball she has the audacity, nay cowardice, to claim that it was all Chris Matthews' fault. He laid a trap, led me into it, I am a victim.
Any serious person who watches that interview sees pretty clearly that if anything, Matthews opened the door by asking Ms. Bachmann to clarify her beliefs, and Ms. Bachmann barged right through. There was no trap, no confusing language in Matthews' question. He asked directly what she thought of Mr. Obama and she answered as she obviously believes.
Cowards and idiots like her do not deserve to be in elected office, whether it's the city council or the U.S. Congress. And to show I'm bipartisan in my disdain for morons, the same goes for the Democrat Congressman in Florida who only won office because of Foley's sexual problems but who went on to cheat on his wife several dozen times.
I seriously hope that party loyalty cannot overcome common sense in both cases.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Why I am Voting for Obama
There are several reasons I will be casting my vote for Barrack Obama over John McCain in two weeks. Many echo the reasons of other independents and moderate conservatives:
1. The Palin pick. No reasonable argument can be made for why she is qualified to be Vice President of the United States.
2. McCain's campaign. I donated the max to McCain in 2000 because of the campaign he ran, and am now voting against him because of the campaign he has run. In 2000 he was honorable, moderate, coherent, and exuded competence. This campaign has been about anger, and not a lot else. He has pandered to the basest of the base, and as such the "Bombs and Jesus" crowd, as described by Hunter Thompson, runs the Republican party. Look at the ads. Watch the coverage of the rallies. Listen to Ms. Palin's rhetoric. Listen to the surrogates (including Congresswoman/Space Cadet Michelle Bachmann).
Only a few years ago it seemed the loony left might hijack the Democrat party. It still may, but it's become obvious that moderates and independents, like me, are trending that way. This is leaving only angry, nativist, anti-intellectual, Christianist whackjobs left in the GOP. I will not be associated with them.
3. Colin Powell. The man should have run for President in '96 and '00. He is, in my opinion, a caricature of what a President should be.
4. One Party Rule. This takes some explaining. The GOP had one party rule for most of 6 years. It was an epic disaster that may, hopefully, destroy the party (see #2). The Democrats are now poised to fall into the same trap. Rather than one party rule being a point for McCain, I see the 75% chance that Democrats will reach too far and implode as a positive.
Political parties are, like unions, dinosaurs that are gradually lurching towards irrelevancy. Obama will either be a centrist and very capable President, which would be good; or he will be a left-wing disaster who will lead his party to self destruction same as Bush.
I for one favor giving the other dinosaur the same rope with which the first dinosaur hung itself.
5. GOP Hack Reaction. Obama and a Dem Congress could tax us into 3rd world status and it would be worth watching the Fraleys, Robinsons, and Freiburgers of the world gnash their teeth for months and years after November 4. For all their complaining about the left's behavior towards Bush (and I agree the left was pathetic all 8 years), the idea that they will take the high road and act like the respectable, loyal opposition they demanded is laughable at best.
6. The prospect of electing an African American President. I will admit what few else will: I never thought I'd see a black President in my lifetime. I think it will be cool to finally have someone other than a white guy. Why not? I like new, exciting, and shiny things like anyone else. With all the other positives of an Obama victory, it's worth it.
1. The Palin pick. No reasonable argument can be made for why she is qualified to be Vice President of the United States.
2. McCain's campaign. I donated the max to McCain in 2000 because of the campaign he ran, and am now voting against him because of the campaign he has run. In 2000 he was honorable, moderate, coherent, and exuded competence. This campaign has been about anger, and not a lot else. He has pandered to the basest of the base, and as such the "Bombs and Jesus" crowd, as described by Hunter Thompson, runs the Republican party. Look at the ads. Watch the coverage of the rallies. Listen to Ms. Palin's rhetoric. Listen to the surrogates (including Congresswoman/Space Cadet Michelle Bachmann).
Only a few years ago it seemed the loony left might hijack the Democrat party. It still may, but it's become obvious that moderates and independents, like me, are trending that way. This is leaving only angry, nativist, anti-intellectual, Christianist whackjobs left in the GOP. I will not be associated with them.
3. Colin Powell. The man should have run for President in '96 and '00. He is, in my opinion, a caricature of what a President should be.
4. One Party Rule. This takes some explaining. The GOP had one party rule for most of 6 years. It was an epic disaster that may, hopefully, destroy the party (see #2). The Democrats are now poised to fall into the same trap. Rather than one party rule being a point for McCain, I see the 75% chance that Democrats will reach too far and implode as a positive.
Political parties are, like unions, dinosaurs that are gradually lurching towards irrelevancy. Obama will either be a centrist and very capable President, which would be good; or he will be a left-wing disaster who will lead his party to self destruction same as Bush.
I for one favor giving the other dinosaur the same rope with which the first dinosaur hung itself.
5. GOP Hack Reaction. Obama and a Dem Congress could tax us into 3rd world status and it would be worth watching the Fraleys, Robinsons, and Freiburgers of the world gnash their teeth for months and years after November 4. For all their complaining about the left's behavior towards Bush (and I agree the left was pathetic all 8 years), the idea that they will take the high road and act like the respectable, loyal opposition they demanded is laughable at best.
6. The prospect of electing an African American President. I will admit what few else will: I never thought I'd see a black President in my lifetime. I think it will be cool to finally have someone other than a white guy. Why not? I like new, exciting, and shiny things like anyone else. With all the other positives of an Obama victory, it's worth it.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Powell Makes the Case
Says it better than I can, as usual:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/powell-endorses.html
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/powell-endorses.html
Monday, October 13, 2008
Couldn't Have Said it Better About McCain...
Than this op-ed in today's Washington Post:
"But imagine if McCain had selected for his running mate not a partisan attack dog but someone with deep knowledge of the economy and a record of reaching across the aisle.
Imagine if McCain himself had decided to respond to this crisis as an American first, a candidate second. "Yes," he might have said, "Democrats contributed to our problems with their lobbyist-fueled defense of Fannie and Freddie. But let's not pretend that Alan Greenspan, Phil Gramm, George W. Bush -- and John McCain -- weren't part of this, too. Warren Buffett saw this coming, but not many of the rest of us did. Let's postpone the recriminations and work together to fix this thing."
He'd probably have my vote, for one thing.
The more I ponder it, the more I think I am opposed to McCain because I think GOP campaigns should strive for a higher standard than what we've been subject to since, oh, 2000.
"But imagine if McCain had selected for his running mate not a partisan attack dog but someone with deep knowledge of the economy and a record of reaching across the aisle.
Imagine if McCain himself had decided to respond to this crisis as an American first, a candidate second. "Yes," he might have said, "Democrats contributed to our problems with their lobbyist-fueled defense of Fannie and Freddie. But let's not pretend that Alan Greenspan, Phil Gramm, George W. Bush -- and John McCain -- weren't part of this, too. Warren Buffett saw this coming, but not many of the rest of us did. Let's postpone the recriminations and work together to fix this thing."
He'd probably have my vote, for one thing.
The more I ponder it, the more I think I am opposed to McCain because I think GOP campaigns should strive for a higher standard than what we've been subject to since, oh, 2000.
Friday, October 10, 2008
Listened to Limbaugh Today
Because nothing else was on, trust me.
Anyway at one point, he complained about a cable news talking head who partially blamed people for living above their means for the recent economic collapse. Rush took umbrage that a member of the liberal drive-by media had the audacity to blame anyone but Democrats.
But, during her debate with Joe Biden, Sarah Palin said,
"We need to make sure that we demand from the federal government strict oversight of those entities in charge of our investments and our savings and we need also to not get ourselves in debt. Let's do what our parents told us before we probably even got that first credit card. Don't live outside of our means. We need to make sure that as individuals we're taking personal responsibility through all of this. It's not the American peoples fault that the economy is hurting like it is, but we have an opportunity to learn a heck of a lot of good lessons through this and say never again will we be taken advantage of."
This plea for personal responsibility - one of the few intelligent things I've heard Palin say - got high ratings from conservatives on the dials.
Funny.
Anyway at one point, he complained about a cable news talking head who partially blamed people for living above their means for the recent economic collapse. Rush took umbrage that a member of the liberal drive-by media had the audacity to blame anyone but Democrats.
But, during her debate with Joe Biden, Sarah Palin said,
"We need to make sure that we demand from the federal government strict oversight of those entities in charge of our investments and our savings and we need also to not get ourselves in debt. Let's do what our parents told us before we probably even got that first credit card. Don't live outside of our means. We need to make sure that as individuals we're taking personal responsibility through all of this. It's not the American peoples fault that the economy is hurting like it is, but we have an opportunity to learn a heck of a lot of good lessons through this and say never again will we be taken advantage of."
This plea for personal responsibility - one of the few intelligent things I've heard Palin say - got high ratings from conservatives on the dials.
Funny.
Palin Abused Authority
So says the investigation she welcomed, but refused to take part in.
Oh and the investigative commission was bipartisan.
I look forward to the excuses and dismissals.
Oh and the investigative commission was bipartisan.
I look forward to the excuses and dismissals.
McCain Tells the Whackos to Pipe Down.
It's about time.
People like that are the reason I won't be voting for McCain. But it's nice to see the old McCain for a change.
ETA: Just saw the video of the rally. McCain was genuinely embarassed by that whackjob woman.
People like that are the reason I won't be voting for McCain. But it's nice to see the old McCain for a change.
ETA: Just saw the video of the rally. McCain was genuinely embarassed by that whackjob woman.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
The Gwen Ifill Controversy
Conservative hacks have their hackles up over the fact that Gwen Ifill will have a book coming out about African American politicians in the age of Barak Obama. Apparently, authoring a book of this kind by definition makes one incapable of asking unbiased questions to Presidential candidates.
According to the editorial review/product description at Amazon.com, the book is about...
"In THE BREAKTHROUGH, veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama’s stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power. Ifill argues that the Black political structure formed during the Civil Rights movement is giving way to a generation of men and women who are the direct beneficiaries of the struggles of the 1960s. She offers incisive, detailed profiles of such prominent leaders as Newark Mayor Cory Booker, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, and U.S. Congressman Artur Davis of Alabama, and also covers up-and-coming figures from across the nation. Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Senator Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Reverend Jesse Jackson, and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the "black enough" conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history. THE BREAKTHROUGH is a remarkable look at contemporary politics and an essential foundation for understanding the future of American democracy."
Now, I have no doubt Ms. Ifill is probably leaning towards Obama. However, the description of this book does not, as conservative hacks suggest, appear to guarantee that it will be propaganda for Obama. It actually appears to be an overview of how the characteristics of African American politicians have changed since the time they marched in lock-step with the Civil Rights Movement.
The hacks' complaints about this issue are moronic for several reasons:
One, Ms. Ifill works for Jim Lehrer, who was the moderator for the Presidential debate.
Two, The Commission on Debates is run by both parties, neither of which has any interest in embarassing their candidates. Obviously this book was known to GOP officials who helped select Ms. Ifill as a moderator.
Three, only a few months ago it was Conservatives who were boasting (rightly) that Democrats were pathetic cowards for refusing to allow Fox News to host one of their debates. I recall them saying, to paraphrase, "If you cannot answer tough questions then how are you qualified to be President of the United States?" I think the same thing applies to this debate, and I think it doubly applies to Governor Palin.
Four, it would be plainly obvious if Ms. Ifill were biased in her questioning.
Five, Conservatives really like this. It gives them an easy excuse if Ms. Palin has a bad night. If, as most of us assume, Ms. Ifill is fair and balanced and Ms. Palin comes off as amateurish as she has in the past month, they have an easy talking point: Of course she looked bad, look who was asking the questions! (Never mind that Ms. Palin would look bad answering a tough question whether it was Sean Hannity, Gwen Ifill or the Easter Bunny doing the asking).
According to the editorial review/product description at Amazon.com, the book is about...
"In THE BREAKTHROUGH, veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama’s stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power. Ifill argues that the Black political structure formed during the Civil Rights movement is giving way to a generation of men and women who are the direct beneficiaries of the struggles of the 1960s. She offers incisive, detailed profiles of such prominent leaders as Newark Mayor Cory Booker, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, and U.S. Congressman Artur Davis of Alabama, and also covers up-and-coming figures from across the nation. Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Senator Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Reverend Jesse Jackson, and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the "black enough" conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history. THE BREAKTHROUGH is a remarkable look at contemporary politics and an essential foundation for understanding the future of American democracy."
Now, I have no doubt Ms. Ifill is probably leaning towards Obama. However, the description of this book does not, as conservative hacks suggest, appear to guarantee that it will be propaganda for Obama. It actually appears to be an overview of how the characteristics of African American politicians have changed since the time they marched in lock-step with the Civil Rights Movement.
The hacks' complaints about this issue are moronic for several reasons:
One, Ms. Ifill works for Jim Lehrer, who was the moderator for the Presidential debate.
Two, The Commission on Debates is run by both parties, neither of which has any interest in embarassing their candidates. Obviously this book was known to GOP officials who helped select Ms. Ifill as a moderator.
Three, only a few months ago it was Conservatives who were boasting (rightly) that Democrats were pathetic cowards for refusing to allow Fox News to host one of their debates. I recall them saying, to paraphrase, "If you cannot answer tough questions then how are you qualified to be President of the United States?" I think the same thing applies to this debate, and I think it doubly applies to Governor Palin.
Four, it would be plainly obvious if Ms. Ifill were biased in her questioning.
Five, Conservatives really like this. It gives them an easy excuse if Ms. Palin has a bad night. If, as most of us assume, Ms. Ifill is fair and balanced and Ms. Palin comes off as amateurish as she has in the past month, they have an easy talking point: Of course she looked bad, look who was asking the questions! (Never mind that Ms. Palin would look bad answering a tough question whether it was Sean Hannity, Gwen Ifill or the Easter Bunny doing the asking).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
